Mawson v. Desimone et al

Filing 210

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), The Report, (Doc. 191), is ADOPTED in part and NOT ADOPTED in part; Defendants motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 157), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;The motion for summary judgme nt is DENIED with respect to the Fourth Amendment claim against Officer Fernandes based upon the February Stop, and this claim shall PROCEED to trial. Samual Desimone (Pittston City Police Officer) and Robert Powers terminated. (See order for details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/15/20. (bs)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-00400-MEM Document 210 Filed 10/15/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT WILLIAM MAWSON, SR., : Plaintiff PITTSTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et at., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-400 : v. : (MANNION, D.J.) : : Defendants ORDER For the reasons set forth in the court’s memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report, (Doc. 191), is ADOPTED in part and NOT ADOPTED in part; (2) Mawson’s objections to the Report, (Doc. 193), are OVERRULED; (3) Defendants’ objections to the Report, (Doc. 195), are OVERRULED in part; (4) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 157), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (5) The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendants and against Mawson on (1) the Fourth Amendment claims against Officer DeSimone and Chief Case 3:16-cv-00400-MEM Document 210 Filed 10/15/20 Page 2 of 2 Powers based upon the February Stop; (2) the Fourth Amendment claims against Officers DeSimone and Fernandes based upon the impoundment of the truck; (3) the First Amendment retaliation claims against Officers DeSimone and Fernandes and Chief Powers based upon the February Stop and traffic citations; (4) the First Amendment retaliation claims against Officers DeSimone and Fernandes and Chief Powers based upon the impoundment of the truck; (5) the Fourth Amendment claims against Officers Fernandes and Shumosic and Chief Powers based on the June Stop; and (6) the First Amendment retaliation claims based upon June Stop resulting traffic citations; (6) The motion for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to the Fourth Amendment claim against Officer Fernandes based upon the February Stop, and this claim shall PROCEED to trial. (7) By separate order the court will set a date for trial. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge DATE: October 15, 2020 16-0400-03 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?