Giterman v. Pocono Medical Center et al

Filing 130

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),denying 94 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Whitestone Care Center from Introducing Evidence filed by Svetlana Giterman; - Granting in Part and Denying in part 109 101 96 97 107 105 103 111 . (See order for Details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/2/19. (bs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SVETLANA GITERMAN, : : Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-0402 : v. : POCONO MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants (JUDGE MANNION) : : ORDER In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The plaintiff’s motion in limine, (Doc. 94), to preclude WCC from introducing evidence it received a civil rights clearance letter from HHS is DENIED. (2) the plaintiff’s motion in limine, (Doc. 96), to exclude the expert testimony and report of Spinelli is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum. (3) The plaintiff’s motion in limine, (Doc. 97), to exclude the expert testimony and report of Sieminski is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum. (4) WCC’s motion in limine, (Doc. 105), to preclude the plaintiff from introducing any evidence regarding a “Golden Rule” argument is GRANTED as unopposed. (5) PMC’s motion in limine to exclude entirely or to limit the testimony Shepard-Kegl, (Doc. 101), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum. (6) WCC’s motions in limine to exclude entirely or to limit the testimony Shepard-Kegl, (Docs. 103, 107, 109 & 111), are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge Date: April 2, 2019 O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2016 MEMORANDA\16-0402-02-ORDER.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?