Balon v. Enhanced Recovery Company, Inc.

Filing 42

Order: JUDGMENT be and hereby is entered in favor of Kariann Balon against Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. Defendants motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, (Doc. 27), is DENIED; Plaintiffs motion to remand, (Doc. 33), is DENIED; Plaintiffs m otion for summary judgment, (Doc. 29), is GRANTED; JUDGMENT in the amount of $1,000.00 is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; Plaintiff shall file a motion or stipulation for attorneys fees and costs on or before September 11, 2017; and The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 8/28/2017. (bg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KARIANN BALON, Plaintiff v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, INC., Defendant : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-0410 (Judge Nealon) ORDER AND NOW, THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2017, upon consideration of the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, (Doc. 27), is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff’s motion to remand, (Doc. 33), is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 29), is GRANTED; 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter JUDGMENT in the amount of $1,000.00 in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; 5. Plaintiff shall file a motion or stipulation for attorney’s fees and costs on or before September 11, 2017; and 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. /s/ William J. Nealon United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?