Jeddo Coal Company v. Rio Tinto Procurement (Singapore) PTE LTD et al

Filing 31

ORDER 1. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a.Defendants' Motion is GRANrED with respect to defendant Quebec Metal Powders LTD. b. In all other respects, Defendants' Motion is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint, as it pertains to Quebec Metal Powders LTD, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to rERMINATE defendant Quebec Metal Powders LTD from this action.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/9/17. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEDDO COAL COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

3:16..CV..621
(JUDGE MARIANI)

RIO TINTO PROCUREMENT
(SINGAPORE) PTE LTD, et at,

Defendants.

h-k..,

ORDER

AND NOW, rHls'1-!..!1- DAY OF MARCH, 2017, upon consideration of
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 14), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. Defendants' Motion is GRANrED with respect to defendant Quebec Metal
Powders LTD.
b. In all other respects, Defendants' Motion is DENIED.
2. Plaintiff's Complaint, as it pertains to Quebec Metal Powders LTD, is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to rERMINATE defendant Quebec Metal Powders
LTD from this action.