Carroll v. Comprehensive Women's Health Services

Filing 65

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING 53 MOTION in Limine to Bifurcate Trial and GRANTING in part/DENYING in part 55 dfts' MOTION in Limine to Preclude Evidence of and Reference to any Other Discrimination Claim Filed Against Them. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 11/16/17. (sm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KATHRYN CARROLL,
Plaintiff

:
No. 3:16cv1509
:
:
(Judge Munley)
v.
:
:
COMPREHENSIVE WOMEN’S :
HEALTH SERVICES;
:
DAVID KREWSON, and
:
ROBERT ZIMMERMAN,
:
Defendants
:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 16th day of November 2017, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
1) Defendants’ motion in limine seeking to bifurcate trial (Doc. 53) is
DENIED; and
2) Defendants’ motion in limine seeking to preclude evidence of and
reference to any other discrimination claim filed against them, including but not
limited to the lawsuit filed by Judy Nagle, (Doc. 55) is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part as follows:
a. Evidence of and reference to Judy Nagle’s or any other
discrimination lawsuit against defendants is precluded as substantive evidence;
but

b. Evidence of and reference to Judy Nagle’s or any other
discrimination lawsuit against defendants is not precluded for impeachment
purposes.
BY THE COURT:
s/ James M. Munley______
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court

2