Juice v. Barrasse et al
Filing
18
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Reconsideration.Paragraph 4 of the Courts May 5, 2017 Order (ECF No. 12) isvacated. Mr. Juice is solely responsible for the single filing feeof the consolidated action, Juice v. Judge Barras se, Civ. No.3:16-cv-1913 (M.D. Pa.). The Clerk of Court is directed to issue the Administrative Orderto the Superintendent of SCI-Benner Township to begindeducting money from the inmates prison account in themanner described in the Administrative Order and this Order. The remaining claims for reconsideration in Mr. Juices motionare denied.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/16/17 (jam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEPHEN JUICE,
Plaintiff
v.
JUDGE MICHAEL BARRASSE,
et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL NO. 3:CV-16-1913
(Judge Caputo)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of JUNE, 2017, in accordance with the accompanying
memorandum, it is ORDERED that:
1.
Mr. Juice’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 16) is granted
in part and denied in part.
2.
Paragraph 4 of the Court’s May 5, 2017 Order (ECF No. 12) is
vacated. Mr. Juice is solely responsible for the single filing fee
of the consolidated action, Juice v. Judge Barrasse, Civ. No.
3:16-cv-1913 (M.D. Pa.).
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to issue the Administrative Order
to the Superintendent of SCI-Benner Township to begin
deducting money from the inmate’s prison account in the
manner described in the Administrative Order and this Order.
4.
The remaining claims for reconsideration in Mr. Juice’s motion
are denied.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?