Juice v. Barrasse et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Reconsideration.Paragraph 4 of the Courts May 5, 2017 Order (ECF No. 12) isvacated. Mr. Juice is solely responsible for the single filing feeof the consolidated action, Juice v. Judge Barras se, Civ. No.3:16-cv-1913 (M.D. Pa.). The Clerk of Court is directed to issue the Administrative Orderto the Superintendent of SCI-Benner Township to begindeducting money from the inmates prison account in themanner described in the Administrative Order and this Order. The remaining claims for reconsideration in Mr. Juices motionare denied.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/16/17 (jam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN JUICE, Plaintiff v. JUDGE MICHAEL BARRASSE, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 3:CV-16-1913 (Judge Caputo) ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of JUNE, 2017, in accordance with the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Juice’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 16) is granted in part and denied in part. 2. Paragraph 4 of the Court’s May 5, 2017 Order (ECF No. 12) is vacated. Mr. Juice is solely responsible for the single filing fee of the consolidated action, Juice v. Judge Barrasse, Civ. No. 3:16-cv-1913 (M.D. Pa.). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue the Administrative Order to the Superintendent of SCI-Benner Township to begin deducting money from the inmate’s prison account in the manner described in the Administrative Order and this Order. 4. The remaining claims for reconsideration in Mr. Juice’s motion are denied. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. RICHARD CAPUTO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?