Martin v. Secretary of Corrections et al

Filing 242

ORDER granting 219 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Myers, Kanagy, Dickson, Fazenbaker, Bickel, Barger, Gaff, Morrison, Neumann, Wetzel, Kauffman and Dreibelbis, and against Plaintiff . The claims against John Neumann in his individual capacity are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's request 9Doc. 239) for a ruling on the motion for summary judgment is DISMISSED as moot. Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/4/21 (jam)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-02060-RDM-CA Document 242 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Civil No. 3:16-cv-2060 TYRONE MARTIN, (Judge Mariani) Plaintiff V. SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, et al., : Defendants ~ AND NOW, this Q ORDER 1 ay of March, 2021, upon consideration of Defendants' motion (Doc. 219) for summary judgment, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion (Doc. 219) for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Timothy Myers, Ryan Kanagy, Brent Dickson , Bradd Fazenbaker, Samuel Bickel, Kevin Barger, Susan Gaff, Matthew Morrison, John Neumann, John Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman, and William Dreibelbis, and against Plaintiff. 3. The claims against John Neumann in his individual capacity are DISMISSED. 4. Plaintiffs request (Doc. 239) for a ruling on the motion for summary judgment is DISMISSED as moot. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Case 3:16-cv-02060-RDM-CA Document 242 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 2 6. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). Robert D. Mariani United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?