Nofsker v. Colvin
Filing
26
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), not adopting Report & Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito; case is remanded to the Commissioner for further action; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 08/31/18. (sm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HEATHER NOFSKER,
:
No. 3:16cv2151
Plaintiff
:
:
(Judge Munley)
v.
: (Magistrate Judge Saporito)
:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
:
Acting Commissioner of
:
Social Security,
:
Defendant
:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 31st day of August 2018, it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1) The plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 23) to the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation are hereby SUSTAINED;
2) The report and recommendation (Doc. 22) is NOT ADOPTED;
3) The case is remanded to the Commissioner for further action consistent
with the accompanying memorandum; and
4) The Clerk of Court is directed enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and
against the defendant and to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
s/ James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?