Witchey et al v. First Gold Buyers, Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Pltfs motion to remand this action to state court, (Doc. 3), is DENIED. The stay entered in this action, (Doc. 8), is LIFTED. Pltfs shall file a brief in opposition to Defts motion to dismiss and brief in support, (Docs. 2, 5), on or before May 15, 2017. Deft may file a reply to Pltfs brief in opposition, if any, inaccordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LocalRules.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 5/1/17. (ao)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LOUIS ANTHONY WITCHEY, ET :
AL.,
:
Plaintiffs
:
:
v.
:
:
FIRST GOLD BUYERS, INC. d/b/a :
SIGNATURE FUNDING,
:
Defendant
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2312
(Judge Nealon)
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 1ST DAY OF MAY, 2017, upon consideration of the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
Plaintiffs’ motion to remand this action to state court, (Doc. 3), is
DENIED.
2.
The stay entered in this action, (Doc. 8), is LIFTED.
3.
Plaintiffs shall file a brief in opposition to Defendant’s motion to
dismiss and brief in support, (Docs. 2, 5), on or before May 15, 2017.
Defendant may file a reply to Plaintiffs’ brief in opposition, if any, in
accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local
Rules.
/s/ William J. Nealon
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?