Layton v. Colvin
Filing
14
JUDGMENT be & is hereby ENTERED in favor of deft Commissioner & against pltf Layton as follows: The decision of the Commissioner denying the app for disability insurance benefits & supp'l security income of Layton is AFFIRMED in acc w/ ct's order 13 of 2/8/18. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/8/18. (ki)
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
MIDDLE DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA
VALENTINA VERNARDA LAYTON,
)
Plaintiff
)
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social
)
Civil Action No.
)
Security,
3:16-CV-2437
(Chief Judge Conner)
)
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
9
the plaintiff
defendant (name)
dollars ($
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
9
x
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
%, along with costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
other:
JUDGMENT be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security, and against plaintiff VALENTINA VERNARDA LAYTON, as follows: The decision of the
Commissioner denying the application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income of
Valentina Vernarda Layton is AFFIRMED, in accordance with the court’s order (Doc. 13), dated February 8,
2018.
This action was (check one):
9 tried by a jury with Judge or Magistrate Judge
rendered a verdict.
9
tried by Judge or Magistrate Judge
X
decided by Judge or Magistrate Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner
COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF HHS DECISION (SSID)
Date:
Feb 8, 2018
CLERK OF COURT PETER WELSH, Acting Clerk of Court
K. McKinney
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?