McCaslin v. Colvin
Filing
31
ORDER re: pltf's supp'l motion for atty's fees 29 - It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Ct's order of 11/22/19 28 authorizing $20,654 remains in full force & effect.; 2. Ct authorizes addt'l pymt for ct-related svcs to Atty Best in amt of $10,314 in atty's fees being w/held from past-due auxiliary benefits.; 3. Total amt of atty's fees for ct-related svcs to be pd from past-due benefits of pltf & pltf's auxiliary beneficiaries to Atty Best shall be $30,968.; 4. Upon receipt of these funds pltf's atty will refund $6,700 previously pd pursuant to EAJA to the pltf. (See order for commplete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/2/19. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER S. MCCASLIN,
Plaintiff
v.
ANDREW SAUL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2491
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s
Supplemental Motion (Doc. 29) for Attorney's Fees pursuant to § 206(b)(1) of the
Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Court’s Order dated November 22, 2019 and filed November 24, 2019
(Doc. 28) authorizing $20,654.00 remains in full force and effect.
2. The Court authorizes an additional payment for court related services to
Patrick J. Best, Esquire in the amount of $10,314.00 in attorney's fees
being withheld from past-due auxiliary benefits.
3. The total amount of attorney’s fees for court related services to be paid
from the past-due benefits of Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s auxiliary
beneficiaries to Patrick J. Best, Esquire shall be $30,968.00.
4. Upon receipt of these funds, Plaintiff’s attorney will refund $6,700
previously paid pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §
2412, to the Plaintiff.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?