Garrett v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK et al

Filing 12

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),the motions to quash filed by the following appellees are GRANTED:(1)Duane Morris and Brett L. Messinger, (Doc. 3);(2)Kristine M. Anthou, Elizabeth M. Cagnon, and Grenen & Birsic PC, (colle ctively, the Grenen appellees), (Doc. 4);(3)JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 5); and(4)Pennymac Loan Services, LLC, (Doc. 6).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the instant appeal filed by pro se appellant Lundes Garrett, (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. The duplicate motions filed by the Grenen appellees, (Doc. 7), and JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 9), are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. ORDER TERMINATING CASESigned by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/27/17. (bs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LUNDES GARRETT, : Appellant, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-0352 v. : (JUDGE MANNION) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., : Appellees. : ORDER In light of the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motions to quash filed by the following appellees are GRANTED: (1) Duane Morris and Brett L. Messinger, (Doc. 3); (2) Kristine M. Anthou, Elizabeth M. Cagnon, and Grenen & Birsic PC, (collectively, the “Grenen appellees”), (Doc. 4); (3) JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 5); and (4) Pennymac Loan Services, LLC, (Doc. 6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the instant appeal filed by pro se appellant Lundes Garrett, (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The duplicate motions filed by the Grenen appellees, (Doc. 7), and JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 9), are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge Date: April 27, 2017 O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2017 MEMORANDA\17-0352-01-Order.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?