Garrett v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK et al
Filing
12
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),the motions to quash filed by the following appellees are GRANTED:(1)Duane Morris and Brett L. Messinger, (Doc. 3);(2)Kristine M. Anthou, Elizabeth M. Cagnon, and Grenen & Birsic PC, (colle ctively, the Grenen appellees), (Doc. 4);(3)JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 5); and(4)Pennymac Loan Services, LLC, (Doc. 6).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the instant appeal filed by pro se appellant Lundes Garrett, (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. The duplicate motions filed by the Grenen appellees, (Doc. 7), and JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 9), are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. ORDER TERMINATING CASESigned by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/27/17. (bs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LUNDES GARRETT,
:
Appellant,
: CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-0352
v.
:
(JUDGE MANNION)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., :
Appellees.
:
ORDER
In light of the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT the motions to quash filed by the following appellees are
GRANTED:
(1)
Duane Morris and Brett L. Messinger, (Doc. 3);
(2)
Kristine M. Anthou, Elizabeth M. Cagnon, and Grenen & Birsic
PC, (collectively, the “Grenen appellees”), (Doc. 4);
(3)
JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 5); and
(4)
Pennymac Loan Services, LLC, (Doc. 6).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the instant appeal filed by pro se
appellant Lundes Garrett, (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction. The duplicate motions filed by the Grenen appellees, (Doc. 7),
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, (Doc. 9), are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of
Court is directed to close this case.
s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Date: April 27, 2017
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2017 MEMORANDA\17-0352-01-Order.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?