Friend v. Financial Recoveries Limited et al

Filing 11

ORDER finding as moot 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 4/25/17 (ep)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD FRIEND, Plaintiff v. FINANCIAL RECOVERIES LIMITED, ET AL., Defendants : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-0409 (Judge Nealon) ORDER AND NOW, THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s amended complaint, (Doc. 5), see FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(1)(B), and Defendant Financial Recoveries Limited’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s original complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), (Doc. 3), and the Court finding that an amended complaint renders the original complaint a legal nullity, see Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hosp., 303 F.3d 271, 276 (3d Cir. 2002) (“An amended complaint supercedes the original version in providing the blueprint for the future course of the lawsuit.”); Jackson v. Hoopes Turf Farm, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167733 (M.D. Pa. 2012) (Conner, J.); 6 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1476 (2nd ed. 1990) (“Once an amended pleading is interposed, the original pleading no longer performs any function in the case . . . .”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant Financial Recoveries Limited’s motion to dismiss the original complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), (Doc. 3), is DISMISSED as MOOT without prejudice. /s/ William J. Nealon United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?