Carsten v. Boylan et al

Filing 19

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). upon consideration of the defendants partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 7) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and their construed motion to strike under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), after review of the submissions of the parties and consistent with the Memorandum filed this date, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are DENIED.Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 10/2/17. (ms)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DUSTIN J. CARSTEN,
Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-cv-00733

CINDY A. BOYLAN and ANDREW (SAPORITO, M.J.)
F. BOYLAN, her husband,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2017, upon consideration of
the defendants’ partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 7) under Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6) and their construed motion to strike under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f),
after review of the submissions of the parties and consistent with the
Memorandum filed this date, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions
are DENIED.
s/ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr.
JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR.
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Dated: October 2, 2017