Thorne v. Hammer et al

Filing 32

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). The Motion to Stay (Doc. 27), is GRANTED and further discovery is STAYED pending the resolution of any dispositive motions; To the extent that they have not already done so, Counsel for th e Defendants shall put their clients employer, the Dauphin County Prison, and any other custodian of the tapes, on notice to secure and not destroy any video tapes or other recordings of any cell block and other locations where Plaintiff was held on April 27, 2017; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if necessary, the parties will submit a joint proposed discovery schedule within 21 days after the resolution of the motion to dismiss (Doc. 22). Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 8/1/18. (ch1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EUGENE C. THORNE, JR, Plaintiff v. C/O HAMMER, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-cv-0939 (CAPUTO, D.J.) (ARBUCKLE, M.J.) ORDER For the reasons set forth in the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion to Stay (Doc. 27), is GRANTED and further discovery is STAYED pending the resolution of any dispositive motions; 2. To the extent that they have not already done so, Counsel for the Defendants shall put their client’s employer, the Dauphin County Prison, and any other custodian of the tapes, on notice to secure and not destroy any video tapes or other recordings of any cell block and other locations where Plaintiff was held on April 27, 2017; and 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if necessary, the parties will submit a joint proposed discovery schedule within 21 days after the resolution of the motion to dismiss (Doc. 22). Date: August 1, 2018 BY THE COURT s/William I. Arbuckle William I. Arbuckle U.S. Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?