Novak v. Berryhill

Filing 22

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), NOT ADOPTING the 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Carlson; Sustaining the pltf's objections; GRANTING aappeal ; Clerk of Court is directed to remand case and enter judgment in favor of the plaintff. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 11/9/18. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RUTH ANN NOVAK, Plaintiff : No. 3:17cv963 : : (Judge Munley) v. : : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, : ACTING COMMISSIONER OF : SOCIAL SECURITY, : Defendant : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW , to wit, this 9th day of November 2018, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Doc. 18) is NOT ADOPTED; 2) The plaintiff’s objection to the report and recommendation (Doc. 19) is SUSTAINED; 3) The plaintiff’s social security appeal is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to remand this case to the Commissioner for the award of benefits as set forth in the accompanying memorandum; and 4) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. BY THE COURT: s/ James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?