Gichuhi v. Doll

Filing 23

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), (1)The report and recommendation of Judge Mehalchick, (Doc. 15), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;(2)The petitioners habeas petition, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that it seeks an individualized bond hearing;(3)The respondents objections to Judge Mehalchicks report, (Doc. 18), are OVERRULED;(4)An individualized bond hearing shall be conducted by an Immigration Judge within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. ORDER TERMINATING CASE. (See order for details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 8/21/18. (bs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAMMY GICHUHI, : : Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-1041 : v. (JUDGE MANNION) : CLAIR DOLL, Warden, : Respondent ORDER For reasons stated in the court’s memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The report and recommendation of Judge Mehalchick, (Doc. 15), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY; (2) The petitioner’s habeas petition, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that it seeks an individualized bond hearing; (3) The respondent’s objections to Judge Mehalchick’s report, (Doc. 18), are OVERRULED; (4) An individualized bond hearing shall be conducted by an Immigration Judge within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order at which the Immigration Judge shall make an individualized finding, and the government shall bear the burden of demonstrating, that the petitioner’s continued detention is still necessary to fulfill the purposes of the detention statute; and (5) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge Dated: August 21, 2018 O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2017 MEMORANDA\17-1041-01-ORDER.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?