Plavin v. Group Health Incorporated
Filing
111
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion to Compel. See Order for specific details. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/3/22 (jam)
Case 3:17-cv-01462-RDM Document 111 Filed 06/03/22 Page 1 of 2
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEVEN PLAVIN, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated, et al.
Plaintiff,
3:17-CV-1462
(JUDGE MARIANI)
V.
GROUP HEALTH INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2022, for the reasons set forth in this Court's
accompanying memorandum opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant GHl's
Motion to Compel (Doc. 95) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Plaintiffs shall answer Interrogatory Numbers 10 and 11 (see Doc. 95-3). In
doing so, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' counsel shall be required to identify all persons
who are clients or prospective clients of Plaintiffs' counsel in this action. Plaintiffs
and Plaintiffs' counsel shall not be required to identify, describe, relate, or
otherwise set forth any communications between any client or prospective client
and Plaintiffs' counsel, including any recitation of any such communications in
narrative form.
2. With respect to Requests for Production Numbers 56, 57, 58 (see Doc. 95-1 ),
Plaintiffs shall produce all documents responsive to Defendant's requests. In
doing so, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' counsel shall not be required to produce or
Case 3:17-cv-01462-RDM Document 111 Filed 06/03/22 Page 2 of 2
otherwise make available documents which contain, record, or memorialize any
communication between Plaintiffs' counsel and any client or prospective client.
Robert .........,.UWL.I~
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?