SIERRA v. KANE et al

Filing 26

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. Mr. Sierras Petition in Chancery by Exigent Circumstances will be construed as a motion for reconsideration, or, in the alternative, motion for leave tofile an amended petition.2. Mr. Sierras motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.3. Mr. Sierras motion for leave to file an amended petition (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/1/18. (dw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTONIO SIERRA,
Petitioner
v.
KATHLEEN KANE, et al.,
Respondents

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-17-1584
(Judge Caputo)

ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of MARCH, 2018, upon consideration of Mr. Sierra’s
“Petition in Chancery by Exigent Circumstances” (ECF No. 21) and for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Mr. Sierra’s “Petition in Chancery by Exigent
Circumstances” will be construed as a motion for
reconsideration, or, in the alternative, motion for leave to
file an amended petition.

2.

Mr. Sierra’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 21) is
DENIED.

3.

Mr. Sierra’s motion for leave to file an amended petition
(ECF No. 21) is DENIED.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
United States District Judge