Navedo v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
Filing
5
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DISMISSING petition for writ of habeas corpus; Clerk of Court is directed to notify the petitioner and CLOSE this case; There is no basis for the issuance of acertificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 09/19/17. (sm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ELISEO NAVEDO,
:
:
Petitioner :
:
v.
:
:
COMMONWEALTH OF
:
PENNSYLVANIA,
:
:
Respondent :
CIVIL NO. 3:17-cv-1648
(Judge Munley)
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 19th day of September 2017, upon preliminary
consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and
in accordance with the court’s Memorandum of the same date, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. See R.
Governing § 2254 Cases R. 4.
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to NOTIFY the petitioner and CLOSE this
case.
3.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c).
BY THE COURT:
s/James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?