Navedo v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al

Filing 5

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DISMISSING petition for writ of habeas corpus; Clerk of Court is directed to notify the petitioner and CLOSE this case; There is no basis for the issuance of acertificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 09/19/17. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELISEO NAVEDO, : : Petitioner : : v. : : COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondent : CIVIL NO. 3:17-cv-1648 (Judge Munley) :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 19th day of September 2017, upon preliminary consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and in accordance with the court’s Memorandum of the same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. See R. Governing § 2254 Cases R. 4. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to NOTIFY the petitioner and CLOSE this case. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). BY THE COURT: s/James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?