Tambasco et al v. United States Department of Army et al

Filing 11

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) is GRANTED.(2) Defendants United States Department of Army, Tobyhanna Army DepotPolice Department, and Claus D. Hensley are DISMISSED from the action.(3) The United States of America is substituted as the sole Defendant in thisaction.(4) Lori Tambascos loss of consortium claim is DISMISSED with prejudice.(5) The United States of America is directed to answer or respond toPlaintiffs Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entryof this Order.(6) The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption as follows: RobertTambasco, Plaintiff v. United States of America, Defendant.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/8/18. (dw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT TAMBASCO and LORI
TAMBASCO,

NO. 3:17-CV-1857

Plaintiffs,
(JUDGE CAPUTO)

v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF ARMY, , et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 8th day of March, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) is GRANTED.

(2)

Defendants United States Department of Army, Tobyhanna Army Depot
Police Department, and Claus D. Hensley are DISMISSED from the
action.

(3)

The United States of America is substituted as the sole Defendant in this
action.

(4)

Lori Tambasco’s loss of consortium claim is DISMISSED with
prejudice.

(5)

The United States of America is directed to answer or respond to
Plaintiff’s Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry
of this Order.

(6)

The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption as follows: Robert
Tambasco, Plaintiff v. United States of America, Defendant.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge