Rogers v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al

Filing 21

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry).(1) Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 5) is GRANTED in part. (2) Plaintiffs federal law claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (3) Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/9/18. (dw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KYLE ROGERS,
Plaintiff,

NO. 3:18-CV-0039

v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 9th day of July, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 5) is GRANTED in
part.

(2)

Plaintiff’s federal law claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

(3)

Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

(4)

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge