WOLF v. County of Adams et al

Filing 5

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),1.Petitioners motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc.2) are GRANTED only for purposes of filing the petitions. 2.The petitions for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1) are DISMISSED without prejudice to any right Petitioner may have to reassert his instant claims in a properly filed civil rights action. 3.The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the above captioned cases. ORDER DISMISSING CASESigned by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/30/18. (bs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PAUL WOLF,
Petitioner

:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-0318

v.

:
(Judge Mannion)

COUNTY OF ADAMS, et al.,
Respondents

PAUL B. WOLF,
Petitioner

:
:

:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-0319

v.

:
(Judge Mannion)

COUNTY OF YORK, et al.,
Respondents

:
:
ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

Petitioner’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis
(Doc.2) are GRANTED only for purposes of filing the
petitions.

2.

The petitions for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1) are
DISMISSED without prejudice to any right Petitioner
may have to reassert his instant claims in a properly
filed civil rights action.

3.

The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the above captioned
cases.

4.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of
appealability.1

s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Dated: April 30, 2018

O :\M annion\shared\M EMO RANDA - DJ\CIVIL M EM O RANDA\2018 M EM O RANDA\18-0318-01-order.wpd

Jurists of reason would not debate the procedural or substantive
disposition of the Petitioner’s claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000). Therefore, no certificate of appealability will be granted. See id.
1