ROSADO v. JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN) et al

Filing 175

ORDER - In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion 174 , it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 155 will be denied in its entirety. The court further finds that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [15 8] will be granted in part and denied in part as follows: (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment will be granted as to Plaintiff's claims that: (a) Defendants failed to give Plaintiff's medical records to Dr. Havrilla on Decembe r 20, 2013; (b) Defendants denied Dr. Havrilla's recommendation that Plaintiff undergo a left eye corneal transplant and right eye cataract surgery; (c) Defendants failed to provide any treatment for an eye infection in November 2015; and (d) De fendants' refused to provide a prescription for Restasis.(2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment will be denied as to Plaintiff's claim that Defendants failed to give Plaintiff his prescription tinted glasses. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 9/30/2022. (caw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GERONIMO FRATICELLI
ROSADO, JR,
Plaintiff
v.
JANE DOE LAW LIBRARIAN, et
al.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-601

(ARBUCKLE, M.J.)

ORDER
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED
that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 155) will be denied in its
entirety. The court further finds that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
(Doc. 158) will be granted in part and denied in part as follows:
(1)

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted as to
Plaintiff’s claims that:
(a)

Defendants failed to give Plaintiff’s medical records to Dr.
Havrilla on December 20, 2013;

(b)

Defendants denied Dr. Havrilla’s recommendation that Plaintiff
undergo a left eye corneal transplant and right eye cataract
surgery;

(c)

Defendants failed to provide any treatment for an eye infection
in November 2015; and

(d)

Defendants’ refused to provide a prescription for Restasis.

Page 1 of 2 

(2)

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied as to
Plaintiff’s claim that Defendants failed to give Plaintiff his prescription
tinted glasses.

Date: September 30, 2022

BY THE COURT
s/William I. Arbuckle
William I. Arbuckle
U.S. Magistrate Judge

Page 2 of 2