Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2022, in accordance with the Memorandum filed concurrently herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Commissioners decision to deny Plaintiff Denise L . Miller benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (see Doc. 1, at 1) is AFFIRMED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of the Commissioner and against Miller; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 1/18/2022. (cw)

Download PDF
Case 3:20-cv-01088-KM Document 20 Filed 01/18/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENISE L. MILLER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-01088 v. (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) COMMISSIONER SECUIRTY,1 OF SOCIAL Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2022, in accordance with the Memorandum filed concurrently herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Commissioner’s decision to deny Plaintiff Denise L. Miller benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (see Doc. 1, at 1) is AFFIRMED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of the Commissioner and against Miller; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: s/ Karoline Mehalchick KAROLINE MEHALCHICK Chief United States Magistrate Judge The Court has amended the caption to replace, as the named defendant, Acting Social Security Commissioner Andrew Saul with his successor, Social Security Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d) (“An action does not abate when a public officer who is a party in an official capacity dies, resigns, or otherwise ceases to hold office while the action is pending. The officer’s successor is automatically substituted as a party.”). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?