Winton v. Adams et al

Filing 38

ORDER : ORDERED THAT: The motions (Doc. 12, 34) are DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 12) for extension of time to file a response to Defendants' answer to the complaint is DENIED as an unnecessary and improper request. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/7/21 (jam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT WINTON, Plaintiff Civil No. 3:20-cv-14 79 (Judge Mariani) V. C.O. ADAMS, et al., Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this '7 ~ day of June, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff's motions (Docs. 12, 34) for appointment of counsel, and in accordance with the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motions (Docs. 12, 34) are DENIED without prejudice. 2. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 12) for extension of time to file a response to Defendants' answer to the complaint is DENIED as an unnecessary and improper request.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?