Winton v. Adams et al
Filing
38
ORDER : ORDERED THAT: The motions (Doc. 12, 34) are DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 12) for extension of time to file a response to Defendants' answer to the complaint is DENIED as an unnecessary and improper request. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/7/21 (jam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT WINTON,
Plaintiff
Civil No. 3:20-cv-14 79
(Judge Mariani)
V.
C.O. ADAMS, et al.,
Defendants
ORDER
AND NOW, this
'7 ~ day of June, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff's
motions (Docs. 12, 34) for appointment of counsel, and in accordance with the
Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
The motions (Docs. 12, 34) are DENIED without prejudice.
2.
Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 12) for extension of time to file a response to
Defendants' answer to the complaint is DENIED as an unnecessary and
improper request.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?