Doe et al v. Schuylkill County Courthouse et al

Filing 132

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendant Roths motion to dismiss (Doc. 72 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: The motion will be GRANTED with respect to the direct PHRA discrimination claim but will beDENIED in all other respects. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 10, 2022. (kjn)

Case 3:21-cv-00477-MCC Document 132 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JANE DOE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SCHUYLKILL COUNTY
COURTHOUSE, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Civil No. 3:21-CV-477

(Magistrate Judge Carlson)

ORDER
AND NOW this 10th day of May 2022, in accordance with the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion, Defendant Roth’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 72) is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: The motion will be
GRANTED with respect to the direct PHRA discrimination claim but will be
DENIED in all other respects.

S/ Martin C. Carlson
Martin C. Carlson
United States Magistrate Judge