Warrick v. Harry et al

Filing 57

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 20) for summary judgment by Defendants Buelto, Green, Barksdale, and Harrison, and the parties respective briefs in support of and in opposition to s aid motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion 20 for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Buelto, Green, Barksdale, and Harrison, and against Plaintiff. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 5/8/2024. (cac)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAUN WARRICK, Civil No. 3:23-cv-591 Plaintiff (Judge Mariani) V. SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY, et al., Defendants fz_ AND NOW, this ~ ORDER day of May, 2024, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 20) for summary judgment by Defendants Buelto, Green, Barksdale, and Harrison, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and in opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion (Doc. 20) for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Buelto, Green, Barksdale, and Harrison, and against Plaintiff. 3. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Robert D. Mariani United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?