Molina v. Rivello et al

Filing 35

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), IT IS ORDERED THAT, the plaintiffs motion to compel, 21 , is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: Molinas request for wholesale disclosure of these documents is DENIED. However, we will also decline the defendants request to wholly preclude access to this potentially relevant information. Instead, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants to submit these documents to the court for its in camera review on or before May 28, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C Carlson on 3/8/24. (rw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIGUEL MOLINA,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
J. RIVELLO, et al.,
Defendants.

Civil No. 3:23-CV-1111
(Chief Judge Brann)
(Magistrate Judge Carlson)

ORDER
AND NOW this 8th day of May 2024, in accordance with the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED THAT, the plaintiff’s motion to compel,
(Doc. 21), is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: Molina’s request
for wholesale disclosure of these documents is DENIED. However, we will also
decline the defendants request to wholly preclude access to this potentially relevant
information. Instead, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants to submit
these documents to the court for its in camera review on or before May 28, 2024.

s/ Martin C. Carlson
Martin C. Carlson
United States Magistrate Judge

12