Hopkins v. Petrucci et al

Filing 39

ORDER - In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion 38 , it is ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (2) Defendant Krowi ak's Motion to Dismiss 17 is DEEMED MOOT. (3) Defendants Gilmartin, Hyler, and Petrucci's Motion to Dismiss 26 is DEEMED MOOT. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 6/5/2024. (caw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALMON HOPKINS,
Plaintiff
v.
JAMES PETRUCCI, et al.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-1675

(ARBUCKLE, M.J.)

ORDER
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is
ORDERED that:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) is DISMISSED with
prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.

(2)

Defendant Krowiak’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) is DEEMED
MOOT.

(3)

Defendants Gilmartin, Hyler, and Petrucci’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
26) is DEEMED MOOT.

(4)

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

Date: June 5, 2024

BY THE COURT
s/William I. Arbuckle
William I. Arbuckle
U.S. Magistrate Judge

Page 1 of 1