Hopkins v. Petrucci et al

Filing 39

ORDER - In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion 38 , it is ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (2) Defendant Krowi ak's Motion to Dismiss 17 is DEEMED MOOT. (3) Defendants Gilmartin, Hyler, and Petrucci's Motion to Dismiss 26 is DEEMED MOOT. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 6/5/2024. (caw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALMON HOPKINS, Plaintiff v. JAMES PETRUCCI, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-1675 (ARBUCKLE, M.J.) ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (2) Defendant Krowiak’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) is DEEMED MOOT. (3) Defendants Gilmartin, Hyler, and Petrucci’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 26) is DEEMED MOOT. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Date: June 5, 2024 BY THE COURT s/William I. Arbuckle William I. Arbuckle U.S. Magistrate Judge Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?