Gray v. V-Tech.

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 of Magistrate Judge Arbuckle; Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Julia K Munley on 7/8/24. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 3:23cv2104 SUZETTE GRAY, Plaintiff (Judge Munley) V. (Magistrate Judge Arbuckle) V-TECH, Defendant ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■• ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ • • ■ ■ • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • ■ • • ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • ■ •• ■ ■ •••••••••••••••• ■ ••••••••••• ■ •• ■ ■ ••••••••••••••• ■ ■ ••• ■ ■ ••••••••••• ■ ■ ••••••••••••• ■ •• ■ ■ •••••••••••• ■ •• ■ ORDER Presently before the court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 12). No objections to the R&R have been filed and the time for such filing has passed. In deciding whether to adopt the report and recommendation when no timely objection is filed, the court must determine if a review of the record evidences plain error or manifest injustice. FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b), 1983 Advisory Committee Notes ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record to accept the recommendation"); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 ); Sullivan v. Cuyler, 723 F.2d 1077, 1085 (3d Cir. 1983). After a careful review, the court thus finds neither clear error on the face of the record nor a manifest injustice, and therefore, the R&R shall be adopted. It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The R&R (Doc. 12) is ADOPTED; 2) Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?