Deitrick v. Costa et al
Filing
380
ORDER setting new deadlines for pending motions and Objections to Reports & Recommendations (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)Signed by Judge William I. Arbuckle, III on 08/14/14. (Arbuckle, William)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA DEITRICK,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARK A. COSTA, et al.,
Defendants,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 4:06-CV-1556
(Judge Brann)
(Magistrate Judge Arbuckle)
ORDER
On November 4, 2014, this Court held a hearing to advise Plaintiff on how
to proceed pro se. At the hearing, the outstanding matters in the case were
discussed and new deadlines were established. The parties are hereby ordered that
any objections or opposition materials are to be filed in accordance with following
timetable:
[Schedule of new deadlines is set forth on the next page.]
Page 1 of 2
Doc. (date)
Motion
Response
Deadline
362
(10/2/14)
R&R (Acri MSJ)
Objections
2/2/2015
367
(10/16/14)
R&R (T. Yoncuski MSJ)
Objections
2/2/2015
372
(10/21/14)
R&R (Balascik MSJ)
Objections
2/2/2015
376
(10/28/14)
R&R (Long et al. MSJ)
Objections
2/2/2015
TBD
Upcoming R&R (Mot. to
Dismiss, doc. 258)
Objections
2/2/2015
342
(8/2/13)
Mot. to Exclude
Pl.’s Opposition
2/2/2015
267
(2/22/13)
Mot. for Sanctions (Disc.)
N/A
331
(7/15/13)
Mot. for Sanctions (Rule 11)
Pl.’s Opposition
2/2/2015
The parties are advised to consult the concurrently filed memorandum for a
more detailed discussion of the above motions and deadlines.
SO ORDERED.
s/William I. Arbuckle, III
William I. Arbuckle, III
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: Nov. 4, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?