Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corporation et al
Filing
566
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Lycoming's 532 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Ground of Conflict Preemption, is GRANTED; Lycoming's 523 Motion for Summary Judgment in light of Tincher v. Omega Flex, is GRANTED; The Clerk of Court is directed to DEFER the entry of judgment until final resolution of this litigation, because this Order adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/3/2017. (jn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JILL SIKKELEE, Individually and
as Personal Representative of the
ESTATE OF DAVID SIKKELEE,
deceased,
Plaintiff,
v.
AVCO CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 4:07-CV-00886
(Judge Brann)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August 2017, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Lycoming’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Ground of
Conflict Preemption, ECF No. 532, is GRANTED;
2.
Lycoming’s Motion for Summary Judgment in light of Tincher v.
Omega Flex, ECF No. 523 is GRANTED;
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to DEFER the entry of judgment until
final resolution of this litigation, because this Order “adjudicates
fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all
the parties,” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
-1-
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?