Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corporation et al

Filing 566

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Lycoming's 532 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Ground of Conflict Preemption, is GRANTED; Lycoming's 523 Motion for Summary Judgment in light of Tincher v. Omega Flex, is GRANTED; The Clerk of Court is directed to DEFER the entry of judgment until final resolution of this litigation, because this Order adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/3/2017. (jn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JILL SIKKELEE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF DAVID SIKKELEE, deceased, Plaintiff, v. AVCO CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 4:07-CV-00886 (Judge Brann) ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of August 2017, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Lycoming’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Ground of Conflict Preemption, ECF No. 532, is GRANTED; 2. Lycoming’s Motion for Summary Judgment in light of Tincher v. Omega Flex, ECF No. 523 is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to DEFER the entry of judgment until final resolution of this litigation, because this Order “adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties,” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). -1- BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?