Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corporation et al

Filing 708

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Sikkelee's 606 motion to strike the replacement expert opinions is DENIED; Sikkelee's 608 motion to strike the opinion of Tom Eagar is DENIED; Sikk elee's 610 motion to strike the opinions of Dale Alexander and Gary Novak is DENIED; Sikkelee's 612 motion to strike propeller analysis and RPM calculation is DENIED; Sikkelee's 614 motion to strike the opinion of Jeffrey Edwards is GRANTED in part; Lycoming's 616 motion to strike the opinion of Michael Schiefer is GRANTED in part; Lycoming's 618 motion to strike the opinion of Donald Sommer is DENIED; Lycoming's 627 motion to strike the rebuttal opinions of Donald Sommer and Richard McSwain is DENIED; and Sikkelee's 648 motion to strike the opinion of Michael Dreikorn is DENIED. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/4/2021. (jr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JILL SIKKELEE, Individually and as
Personal Representative of the Estate of
David Sikkelee, Deceased,

No. 4:07-CV-00886
(Judge Brann)

Plaintiff,
v.
PRECISION AIRMOTIVE
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
FEBRUARY 4, 2021
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Sikkelee’s motion to strike the replacement expert opinions (Doc. 606)
is DENIED;

2.

Sikkelee’s motion to strike the opinion of Tom Eagar (Doc. 608) is
DENIED;

3.

Sikkelee’s motion to strike the opinions of Dale Alexander and Gary
Novak (Doc. 610) is DENIED;

4.

Sikkelee’s motion to strike propeller analysis and RPM calculation
(Doc. 612) is DENIED;

5.

Sikkelee’s motion to strike the opinion of Jeffrey Edwards (Doc. 614)
is GRANTED in part, to the extent that Edwards may not offer
testimony related to the allegedly missing shoulder harness and injuries
that purportedly arose as a result of the missing shoulder harness. The
motion is DENIED in all other respects;

6.

Lycoming’s motion to strike the opinion of Michael Schiefer (Doc.
616) is GRANTED in part, to the extent that Schiefer may not offer
testimony related to Lycoming’s legal duties under the regulatory
framework discussed in Schiefer’s expert report. The motion is
DENIED in all other respects;

7.

Lycoming’s motion to strike the opinion of Donald Sommer (Doc. 618)
is DENIED;

8.

Lycoming’s motion to strike the rebuttal opinions of Donald Sommer
and Richard McSwain (Doc. 627) is DENIED; and

9.

Sikkelee’s motion to strike the opinion of Michael Dreikorn (Doc. 648)
is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
2