Kimmett v. Corbett et al

Filing 196

ORDER: In conformity with the Memorandum 195 issued this date, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation 177 of Magistrate Judge Blewitt is adopted in part and rejected in part; defendants' motion 79 for summary judgment is granted ; plaintiff's motion 86 for summary judgment is denied; Count I of the second amended complaint 35 is dismissed with prejudice; Counts II and III of the second amended complaint 35 are dismissed without prejudice; final judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on Count I; the clerk is directed to close the case file. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/22/13. (km)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS D. KIMMETT, Plaintiff, v. TOM CORBETT, et. al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 4:08-CV-1496 (Judge Brann) (Magistrate Judge Blewitt) ORDER April 22, 2013 In conformity with the memorandum issued this date, 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Blewitt is ADOPTED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART. Report and Recommendation, June 24, 2011, ECF No. 177. 2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, July 16, 2010, ECF No. 79. 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, July 16, 2010, ECF No. 86. 4. Count I of the second amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Second Amended Complaint, March 3, 2009, ECF No. 35. 5. Counts II and III of the second amended complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Second Amended Complaint, March 3, 2009, ECF No. 35. 1 6. Final Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on Count I. 7. The clerk is directed to close the case file. s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?