Dennis v. Jensen et al

Filing 44

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) is ADOPTED.(2) Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. 32) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants Richard Jensen, PA-C, Jane Vander Hey-Wright, HCA, and Mary Jane Denuzz ia, RN. (3) Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 18) is DENIED. (4) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is DENIED.(5)The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/20/13. (jam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES E. DENNIS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-CV-1486

Plaintiff,
v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

RICHARD JENSEN, et al.,

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLEWITT)

Defendants.

ORDER
NOW this 20th day of May, 2013, after consideration of Magistrate Judge Thomas M.
Blewitt’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) and Plaintiff James E. Dennis’s objections
(Doc. 41), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) is ADOPTED.

(2)

Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 32) is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE as to Defendants Richard Jensen, PA-C, Jane Vander
Hey-Wright, HCA, and Mary Jane Denuzzia, RN.

(3)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 18) is DENIED.

(4)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is DENIED.

(5)

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge