Criscitello v. MHM Services, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER: In conformity with this court's Memorandum (filed previously as separate docket entry 43 ), IT IS ORDERED THAT: defendant's motion 26 for partial summary judgment is GRANTED as to plaintiff's claims arising under the FMLA; plaintiff's state law claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and violation of the PA Wage Payment and Collection Law are DISMISSED without prejudice so that plaintiff may re-file these claims in the appropriate state court; plaintiff's motion 37 to strike the declarations of John Wilson and Joel Andrade is DISMISSED as moot; the clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/9/13. (km)

Download PDF
Criscitello v. MHM Services, Inc. et al Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMY D. CRISCITELLO, Plaintiff, v. MHM SERVICES, INC., MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC., and SANDRA CHEREWKA Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 4:10-CV-02004 (Judge Brann) ORDER August 9, 2013 AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2013, the Court Orders and Directs as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claims arising under the FMLA. ECF No. 25. 2. Plaintiff’s state law claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and violation of the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law are DISMISSED without prejudice so that Plaintiff may re-file these claims in the appropriate state court. Dockets.Justia.com 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Declarations of John Wilson and Joel Andrade is DISMISSED as moot. ECF No. 37. 4. The clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. . BY THE COURT: s/Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?