Swanger et al v. Warrior Run School District et al

Filing 121

ORDER THAT: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion (Doc. 111) is DENIED. 2. If Plaintiffs would like the Court to conduct an in camera review of aspecific document, or documents, listed within the Philadelphia Diversified Treatment Claim File Privilege Log, and can present compelling evidence as to their contention that the document(s) do not fall within the recognized psychologist/psychiatrist-patient privilege, the Court will consider conducting such a review upon aproper motion by Plaintiffs, A motion for in camera review of any document{s) within the privilege log at issue must be submitted within seven days of the date of this Order.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/3/14. (jfg)

'rHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ELAINE AND VICTOR SWANGER,
as parents and legal guardians of
B.J.S., and B.J.S.
Plaintiffs,

v.

4:11-CV-894
(JUDGE MARIANI)

WARRIOR RUN
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, THIS

~DAY OF JUNE 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiffs'

Motion for In Camera Review and for Reconsideration of March 17, 2014 Order (Doc. 111),
and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion (Doc. 111) is DENIED.
2. If Plaintiffs would like the Court to conduct an in camera review of a specific
document, or documents, listed within the Philadelphia Diversified Treatment Claim
File Privilege Log, and can present compelling evidence as to their contention that
the document(s) do not fall within the recognized psychologist/psychiatrist-patient
privilege, the Court will consider conducting such a review upon a proper motion by

Plaintiffs, A motion for in camera review of any document{s) within the privilege log
at issue must be submitted within seven days of the date of this Order.

Robert rT,I\7t.:!I'ffl;tt'l'i'"
United States District Court Judge

2