Sweeney v. Roche Diagnostics Corporation

Filing 59

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 58 ): In accordance with the Memorandum of this same date 58 - Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment 32 is DENIED.Plaintiff Benjamin Sweeney's Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is DENIED. Plaintiff Benjamin Sweeney's claims for punitive damages under the Pennsylvania Human Rights Act, 43 Pa. C.S.A. § 955 et seq., are WITHDRAWN. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 12/19/13. (km)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BENJAMIN SWEENEY
Plaintiff,
v.
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORP.,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Civ. No. 4:11-CV-01691
(Judge Brann)

ORDER
December 19, 2013
AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED, in
accordance with a Memorandum of this same date, that:
1.

Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation’s Motion for Summary
Judgment is DENIED.

2.

Plaintiff Benjamin Sweeney’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
DENIED.

3.

Plaintiff Benjamin Sweeney’s claims for punitive damages under the
Pennsylvania Human Rights Act, 43 Pa. C.S.A. § 955 et seq., are
WITHDRAWN.

BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge