United States Of America v. Bogart et al

Filing 14

ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltf shall respond to 2nd MTD 11 in acc w/ both FRCP & MDPA Local Rules.; 2. Motion to dismiss 6 DENIED as MOOT w/out prejudice. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 08/22/12. (ki)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
DUSTIN BOGART and
MARCY A. BOGART,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-cv-0347
(Judge Conner)

ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the motion
to dismiss (Doc. 6), filed July 26, 2012 by defendants Dustin Bogart and Marcy A.
Bogart (“the Bogarts”) and it appearing that the Bogarts have failed to file a brief in
support as required by Middle District Local Rule 7.5 (stating “Within fourteen (14)
days after the filing of any motion, the party filing the motion shall file a brief in
support of the motion . . . . If a supporting brief is not filed within the time provided
in this rule the motion shall be deemed to be withdrawn.”), and upon further
consideration of this court’s order dated August 13, 2012 directing the Bogarts to
file a supporting brief no later than August 20, 2012 or the motion would be denied
without prejudice (Doc. 7), and the court further noting the Bogarts filed an
additional motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) with a supporting brief (Doc. 12) on
August 20, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff shall respond to the second motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) in
accordance with both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the
Middle District Local Rules.

2.

The motion to dismiss the complaint (Doc. 6) is DENIED as moot
without prejudice.

S/ Christopher C. Conner
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
United States District Judge