Nittany Outdoor Advertising et al v. College Township

Filing 48

ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum, filed this same date as separate docket entry No. 47, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment and for permanent injunctive relief 25 and 28 are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (See Order for details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/20/14. (km)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NITTANY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, LLC and STEPHANAS MINISTRIES, : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiffs v. COLLEGE TOWNSHIP, Defendant. Case No. 4:12-cv-00672 (Judge Brann) ORDER May 20, 2014 In accordance with the Memorandum filed this same date IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs’s motions for partial summary judgment and for permanent injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 25 & 28) are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2. The permit requirement (Coll. Twp Code § 170-4) and variance procedure (Coll. Twp. Code § 170-27) set forth in the Sign Ordinance of College Township are each UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. 3. College Township and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are ENJOINED from enforcing against plaintiffs the Sign Ordinance’s permit requirement and all Ordinance clauses to the extent they implement the permit requirement. 4. College Township and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are ENJOINED from enforcing against plaintiffs the Sign Ordinance’s variance procedures and all Ordinance clauses to the extent they implement the variance procedures. BY THE COURT: s/Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?