Barr v. Textron Inc
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt 8 ; granting in part and dening in part defendant's motion to dismiss 4 ; remanding the case to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/11/13. (km)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRACY M. BARR,
Plaintiff,
v.
TEXTRON INC,
t/a Textron/Lycoming Engines,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil Action No. 4:12-CV-2020
(Judge Brann)
(Magistrate Judge Blewitt)
ORDER
June 11, 2013
BACKGROUND:
The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the March
5, 2013 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt. ECF
No. 8. No objections have been filed. Moreover, counsel for defendant, whose
motion was disposed of by the magistrate judge, called the chambers of the
undersigned to confirm that there are no objections to the report and
recommendation.
Because this Court agrees with Judge Blewitt’s analysis and counsel
confirmed there are no objections, the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of
the magistrate judge and will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
1.
United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt’s March 5, 2013
Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. ECF No. 8.
2.
Defendant’s October 17, 2012 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part in conformity with the report and
recommendation. ECF No. 4.
3.
The action is remanded to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further
proceedings.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?