Barr v. Textron Inc

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt 8 ; granting in part and dening in part defendant's motion to dismiss 4 ; remanding the case to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/11/13. (km)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRACY M. BARR, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON INC, t/a Textron/Lycoming Engines, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 4:12-CV-2020 (Judge Brann) (Magistrate Judge Blewitt) ORDER June 11, 2013 BACKGROUND: The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the March 5, 2013 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt. ECF No. 8. No objections have been filed. Moreover, counsel for defendant, whose motion was disposed of by the magistrate judge, called the chambers of the undersigned to confirm that there are no objections to the report and recommendation. Because this Court agrees with Judge Blewitt’s analysis and counsel confirmed there are no objections, the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge and will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 1. United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt’s March 5, 2013 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. ECF No. 8. 2. Defendant’s October 17, 2012 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in conformity with the report and recommendation. ECF No. 4. 3. The action is remanded to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?