Messner v. SWEPI, LP

Filing 24

ORDER: United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's July 26, 2013 Report and Recommendation 21 is ADOPTED in full. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/14/13. (km)

Download PDF
Messner v. SWEPI, LP Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDGAR H. MESSNER, Plaintiff, v. SWEPI, LP, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-00014 (Judge Brann) (Magistrate Judge Carlson) ORDER August 14, 2013 BACKGROUND: The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the July 26, 2013 report and recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson. ECF No. 21. Magistrate Judge Carlson’s report and recommendation recommended that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4) be granted and this case be closed. Plaintiff filed objections to the report on August 9, 2013 which the Court also considers. ECF No. 22. The Court agrees with the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge’s analysis and sees no reason to re-consider or re-state it here. Additionally, Plaintiff’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com objections do not refute the magistrate judge’s clear finding that the plain language of the lease between the parties provided for rental payments to be made for wells, such as the one on Plaintiff’s land, that have been drilled but are not producing. Accordingly, the July 26, 2013 report and recommendation will be adopted in its entirety and this action will be dismissed with prejudice. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 1. United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson’s July 26, 2013 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. ECF No. 21. 2. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?