Vacaflor v. The Pennsylvania State University et al

Filing 31

ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum of this same and filed previously as record document no. 30, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1.Defendant The Pennsylvania State University's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED 17 and the Defendant is DISMISSED from the action. 2.Defendant The Pennsylvania State University's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED 9 and DISMISSED as moot. 3. Defendants Pennsylvania College of Technology, Heather Dorman, and Susan Swank-Cashera's Motion to Dismiss 8 is DENIED and DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/21/14. (km)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARCELO EDDY VACAFLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE
UNIVERSITY, PENNSYLVANIA
COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY,
SUSAN SWANK-CASCHERA,
HEATHER DORMAN,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case No. 4:13-CV-00601

(Judge Brann)

ORDER
July 21, 2014
AND NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the Memorandum of this same
date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendant The Pennsylvania State University’s Motion to Dismiss is
GRANTED (ECF No. 17) and the Defendant is DISMISSED from the
action.

2.

Defendant The Pennsylvania State University’s Motion to Dismiss is
GRANTED (ECF No. 9) and DISMISSED as moot.

1

3.

Defendants Pennsylvania College of Technology, Heather Dorman,
and Susan Swank-Cashera’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) is
DENIED and DISMISSED as moot.

BY THE COURT:
s/Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge

2