Snider v. Corbett et al
Filing
72
ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 65 ; DISMISSING defendant Warden Doug Shaffer with prejudice; DENYING plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order 48 ; DENYING plaintiff's motion to preserve elements of original complaint 59 ; REMANDING the action to the magistrate judge.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 12/5/14. (km)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOEL SNIDER,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
v.
TOM CORBETT, et. al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-1226
(Judge Brann)
(Magistrate Judge Schwab)
ORDER
December 5, 2014
The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the
November 4, 2014 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan E.
Schwab. ECF No. 65. Plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation
of the magistrate judge. ECF No. 71.
Judge Schwab’s analysis is thorough, and the objections of the Plaintiff do
nothing to cure the legal insufficiencies raised by the magistrate judge. The Court
will conserve judicial resources and adopt the report and recommendation in its
entirety without further comment.
1
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
1.
The November 4, 2014 report and recommendation of Magistrate
Judge Susan E. Schwab is ADOPTED. ECF No. 65.
2.
Defendant Warden Doug Shaffer is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3.
Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED.
ECF No. 48.
4.
Plaintiff’s “Motion to Preserve Elements of Original Complaint” is
DENIED. ECF No. 59.
5.
The action is remanded to the magistrate judge.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?