George v. PA Board of Probation and Parole

Filing 11

ORDER: In accordance w/the Memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry #10 - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. If he so chooses, George may challenge attack the fact or durati on of his ongoing Pennsylvania state confinement via submission of a federal habeas corpus petition. 3. If George wants to pursue civil rights claims under Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74 (2005), he may file a motion for reconsideration within fo urteen (14) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Any reconsideration motion should be accompanied by a proposed amended complaint which clearly sets forth the factual basis underlying his claims. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/24/14. (km)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KASINE GEORGE, : : Plaintiff : : v. : CIVIL NO. 3:CV-14-25 : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : (Judge Brann) PROBATION AND PAROLE, : : Defendant : _________________________________________________________________ ORDER April 24, 2014 In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. If he so chooses, George may challenge attack the fact or duration of his ongoing Pennsylvania state confinement via submission of a federal habeas corpus petition. 3. If George wants to pursue civil rights claims under Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74 (2005), he may file 1 a motion for reconsideration within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Any reconsideration motion should be accompanied by a proposed amended complaint which clearly sets forth the factual basis underlying his claims. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. BY THE COURT: s/Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?