Brown v. American Sintered Technologies

Filing 35

ORDER (MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry no. 34): The Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration 30 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; The Court's Order of 11/20/2014 28 is VACATED; the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint 26 is GRANTED. The Defendant shall file an answer or responsive pleading on or before 3/23/2015. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/3/15. (km) Modified on 3/3/2015 (km).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KYLE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SINTERED TECHONOLOGIES, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 4:14-cv-0410 (Judge Brann) ORDER March 3, 2015 AND NOW, in accordance with the Memorandum of this same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part (ECF No. 30). 2. The Court’s Order of November 20, 2014 (ECF No. 28) is VACATED. 3. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED. 4. The Defendant shall file an answer or responsive pleading on or before March 23, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?