Frankenfield v. MicroBilt Corporation

Filing 39

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court adopts the R&R of MJ Carlson. (Doc. No. 38); 2. Deft MicroBilt Corps First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED; 3. Pltf Mary Beth Frankenfields amended complaint (Doc. No . 19) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;4. Pltf may amend her complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of thisOrder to address the pleading deficiencies identified in MJCarlsons R&R with respect to standing; and 5. This matter is remanded to MJ Carlson for further proceedings. 19 32 38 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 11/4/16. (sc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARY BETH FRANKENFIELD, Plaintiff v. MICROBILT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : No. 4:14-cv-1112 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Carlson) ORDER Before the Court in the above-captioned action is the October 3, 2016 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson. (Doc. No. 38.) No timely objections have been filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this 4th day of November, 2016, upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. No. 38); 2. Defendant MicroBilt Corporation’s First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff Mary Beth Frankenfield’s amended complaint (Doc. No. 19) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. Plaintiff may amend her complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order to address the pleading deficiencies identified in Magistrate Judge Carlson’s Report and Recommendation with respect to standing; and 5. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?