Regassa v. Brininger et al

Filing 201

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 179 remaining Defendants' motion for summaryjudgment is construed as seeking partial summary judgment and is partially granted; summary judgment is grante d in favor of Defendants Bubebendorf and Wise on the basis of law of personal involvement; Defendant Kulp's request for entry of summary judgment is denied; (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/27/18. (lg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ADMASSU REGASSA, Plaintiff v. C. BRININGER, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : NO. 4:14-CV-1122 (Judge Brann) ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of September 2018, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Remaining Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 179) is construed as seeking partial summary judgment and is PARTIALLY GRANTED. 2. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendants Bubebendorf and Wise on the basis of lack of personal involvement. 3. Defendant Kulp’s request for entry of summary judgment is DENIED. 4. Summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the FTCA claims of assault and negligence pertaining to the placement of Plaintiff in ambulatory restraints. -1- 5. The Bivens claim of excessive force against Brinninger, Kranzel, and Kulp and the related FTCA claim of assault pertaining to the alleged attack of Plaintiff on July 8, 2013 will proceed against Defendants Brininger, Kranzel, Kulp, and United States Federal Bureau of Prisons. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?