Regassa v. Brininger et al

Filing 231

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 202 Regassa's motion for reconsideration is denied; 223 Defendants' motion for reconsideration is granted; judgment is entered in favor of Defendants with respect to all Bivens claims. The sole remaining claim is Regassa's FTCA assault claim related to the alleged July 8, 2013 assault. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/14/19. (lg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 4:14-CV-01122

ADMASSU REGASSA,

(Judge Brann)

Plaintiff,
v.
C. BRININGER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AUGUST 14, 2019
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Regassa’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 202) is DENIED;

2.

Defendants’ motion for reconsideration (Doc. 223) is GRANTED; and

3.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants with respect to all Bivens
claims. The sole remaining claim is Regassa’s FTCA assault claim
related to the alleged July 8, 2013 assault.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge